Search256 Results

This document sets forth procedures for the reporting and resolution of complaints of Discrimination, Harassment and related misconduct including Sex-Based Harassment, Sexual Assault, Interpersonal Violence, Stalking, Complicity, and Retaliation involving a University employee as the Responding Party.
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill is committed to promoting a safe and healthy campus environment that is free from violence. This procedure sets forth steps for reporting, responding, and resolving reports of Workplace Violence.
These Procedures set out the processes for addressing reports under the Title IX Sexual Harassment Policy.
This document sets forth procedures for the reporting and resolution of complaints of Discrimination, Harassment, and related misconduct including Sex-Based Harassment, Sexual Assault, Interpersonal Violence, Stalking, Complicity, and Retaliation involving a student as the Responding Party.
This Policy applies to Procedures for Addressing Misconduct Involving a Carolina Community Academy Student as a Reporting or Responding Party.
This procedure details the steps to request and reconcile prepaid cards related to a sponsored project.
The purpose of this Procedure is to outline the requirements and process for requesting waivers in the EHRA recruitment process.
For any employee who does not meet the PI eligibility criteria in OSP operating standard 200.03 - Principal Investigator (PI) Eligibility, a request to waive the PI eligibility operating standard must be submitted and approved by the Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP).
A Financial Guarantee is prepared and submitted electronically through Research Administration Management System and eSubmission (RAMSeS) in order to request Pre-Award spending.
Completing successful award management is dependent on establishing solid monitoring mechanisms maintained by the department receiving the award. Monitoring is an essential activity throughout the life of the project and is particularly important for financial management. These processes should be established for each award at the receipt of funding. Departments may use the monitoring mechanisms that work best for their department to maintain financial and personnel data for each sponsored proje
The Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) approves Just-in-Time (JIT) Requirements for National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards through eRA Commons.* The Principal Investigator (PI) first supplies the information in eRA Commons and in Research Administration Management System and eSubmission (RAMSeS), then notifies OSR, who then reviews and approves the information before submitting the approval to NIH and updates University records.
Most funding agencies require a proposed budget that estimates the total costs of the project, with a breakdown of cost per year. A budget based on hourly rates is one that includes the Institutional Base Salary (IBS), fringe benefits, health insurance, and Indirect Costs (F&A) together in a lump sum. It is most often found in subrecipient budgets and must be calculated and shown at the proposal stage.
Health insurance estimations are based on the percentage of effort the employee will work on a project and can differ depending on the classification of the University employee. Health insurance covers a 12-month period. Effective in Summer 2018, budgeting of health insurance costs on faculty compensation outside of their 9-month appointment (summer salary) may be included in proposals.
Fringe benefit rates are expenses directly related to employment. They are determined by an employee’s classification and applied as a percentage of the employee's proposed annual salary. These rates serve as the baseline figures used to calculate fringe benefits. Social Security rates may vary for post-docs and graduate students depending upon the University’s operating standard and the type of award.
Salary caps, generally seen with Public Health Service funding, limit the amount of funding the agency will provide for an individual’s salary. The current NIH salary cap amount is reviewed annually. When an individual’s projected salary exceeds an agency-mandated salary cap, the administrating University department is responsible for funding the difference.