Search18 Results

The overarching purpose of post-tenure review at the School of Law is to serve as an additional means of fostering the School's mission of educational excellence, including its goal of providing high-quality instruction to its students and contributing to the development of the law through scholarship and service. In order to achieve this purpose, the review process should assist individual faculty members in their ongoing professional development.

This policy describes the process of Post-Tenure Review for tenured faculty in the School of Medicine at UNC Chapel Hill, ensuring that all tenured faculty undergo a rigorous peer review every five years. The process is designed to recognize faculty accomplishments, provide constructive feedback on performance, and address substantial deficiencies where they exist.

This document establishes the College of Arts and Sciences' policies and procedures for conducting post-tenure reviews of tenured faculty members every five years. The purpose is to promote faculty development, ensure continued professional productivity, and provide accountability through a systematic evaluation process that includes peer review and, when necessary, faculty success plans for improvement.

This procedure explains when someone may appeal to the UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees, how to file an appeal, how the Board of Trustees reviews the appeal, the criteria for how the Board of Trustees decides appeals, and how the Board of Trustees communicates regarding appeals.

This document establishes the formal policies and procedures governing academic tenure at UNC-Chapel Hill, covering the conditions under which tenure is granted, the faculty ranks to which it applies, the grounds and processes for suspension, demotion, discharge, nonreappointment, and termination. It also defines faculty rights to hearings, administrative review, and appeals to the Board of Trustees, and affirms protections for academic freedom.

The PTR process respects the basic principles of academic freedom and should be flexible enough to acknowledge different expectations in different disciplines and changing expectations at different stages of faculty careers. These policies and procedures conform to the basic principles and guidelines for post-tenure review as defined by the Office of the Provost, the UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees, and the UNC Board of Governors.

This document establishes the Adams School of Dentistry's policy for the periodic, comprehensive review of all tenured faculty, conducted at least every five years. Its goals are to promote faculty development, ensure productivity and accountability, recognize exemplary performance, and provide a structured process — including faculty success plans — for addressing cases where faculty do not meet performance expectations.

This policy document establishes the procedures and expectations for the Post-Tenure Review (PTR) process at the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, in compliance with UNC System policy. Its purpose is to support tenured faculty in meeting performance expectations, recognize exemplary performance, and provide a structured plan for improvement — including potential sanctions — when expectations are not met.

This policy establishes a systematic process for the periodic, comprehensive review of the performance of all tenured School of Social Work faculty every five years, covering research, engagement, and teaching. The process is intended to recognize outstanding performance, foster professional development, ensure accountability, and address performance deficiencies where they exist.

The purpose of post-tenure review at UNC-Chapel Hill and the School of Civic Life and Leadership ("SCiLL" or "School") is to contribute to achieving the School and University missions of educational excellence. The review process for all tenured faculty members should assist them in their ongoing professional development, including efforts to enhance their skills as teachers, their accomplishments as scholars, and their contributions to the profession and the public.

This policy establishes the process by which the School of Education conducts periodic, comprehensive reviews of tenured faculty performance across teaching, research, and service. Its goals are to promote faculty development, ensure productivity, and provide accountability, while also outlining consequences and support structures for faculty who do not meet expectations.

Post-tenure review is a systematic process for the periodic, comprehensive review of the performance of all faculty members having permanent tenure and whose primary duties are teaching, research and/or service. The goals of post-tenure review are to promote faculty development, ensure faculty productivity, and provide accountability. The post-tenure review process should respect the basic principles of academic freedom.

By mandate of the UNC Board of Trustees, each department and unit of the University must develop a periodic, comprehensive review of the performance of tenured faculty members. The goals of the post tenure review are to promote faculty development, ensure faculty productivity, and provide accountability.

This provides guidance on post-tenure review for School of Nursing associate professors, including those seeking promotion, professors, and division heads.

To describe the guidelines for appointment, promotion, and tenure as well as post-tenure review in the School of Nursing at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.